PART A
1. I found my article on the Department of Labor's website. I simply searched for the unemployment rate.
In summary, this is a graph conducted by the United States Department of Labor in order to show the unemployment rate over a given period.
2. Functions can occur in many ways. One way you can distinguish whether or not something is a function is to understand that it only occurs when one input is assigned exactly one output. Another way you could tell whether or not something is a function is by looking a the graph. If the graph passes the vertical line test, then there is a function.
3.
4. This function represents the relationship between time and the percent of people unemployed in the during the month of January from 2005 to 2015.
5. This graph does not represent a linear function because it is not a straight line. Furthermore, this graph does not have a constant rate of change at every interval. We know this by referring to the graph. On January 2007, the unemployment rate was approximately 5%. On January 2010, the Unemployment rate is was about 10%. Then, on January 2014, the unemployment rate dropped to about 7%. The constant changes in the rate of change do not allow the line to be straight and thus, not creating a linear function.
6. This function is not a mathematical model because the percent of the unemployment rate (output) does not depend on time (input). ( The unemployment percentage actually depends on the economy)
Percent = f(time)
PART B
This graph is not a function. It is not a function because you can have two outputs for one input. For example, you can have a set of people with an average income of $50000 who have 40% chance of voting for Romney, but you could also have another group of people with an average of $50000 who have a 60% of voting for Romney. this will not allow the graph to pass the vertical line test, which is another reason as to why it would not be a function.
Hi Alex, for the part one , I agree with you that is not a linear function, since it is not a straight line and also it didn't have the same rate of change.
ReplyDeleteFor the part B, it is not a function as you mentioned that it showed two outputs per input.
I like how you explain in detail and relate back to your graph
ReplyDeleteI like the examples that you chose to use, and the in depth explanations you provided in each part. Well done!
ReplyDeletealex,
ReplyDeleteboth are very good real world examples of functions and non functions. remember that the definition for a function is exactly one output per input, and not visa versa as you stated in your second sentence. other than that, your explanations are very detailed and easy to understand! nice job!
professor little