Sunday, February 8, 2015

Blog Post 2: What's Your Function: Aroob Qutub



Part A:
-http://www.tradingeconomics.com/united-states/gdp-growth
-A vertical line test could be done to determine wether a relationship is a function, and also a relationship must have one output for each input.

Graph of GDP growth rate in the United States from 2012-2015
- This graph represents the growth rate of The Gross Domestic Product (GDP) in the United States from 2012 to 2015.

-This graph is proved to be a function, because each input is paired with one output, so each year shows a different growth rate. This relation passes the Vertical line test, because there are no vertical lines that intersect the graph at more than one point.

-The relation has both dependent variables the (year) and (GDP growth rate), and the average rate of change between the years isn't constant and the graph isn't a straight line, therefore this relation does not account to be a linear function.

-The function can not be a mathematical model because the (GDP growth rate) depends on economic activity and not on the (year).

http://www.tradingeconomics.com/united-states/gdp-growth

Part B:
-relationships that have more than one output for each input can not be functions. 

-http://www.economist.com/news/economic-and-financial-indicators/21641244-metal-prices

-This graph shows the rate of fall in different metal prices in China from 2011-2015. The prices of different metals such as zinc, aluminum, nickel, and iron each decrease at a different percentage each year starting from 2011 to 2015, but all have a different rate of change that is not constant throughout the years.

- This relationship does not represent a function because the rates of price decrease in the graph overlap, which means that one input has more than one output.

http://www.economist.com/news/economic-and-financial-indicators/21641244-metal-prices




3 comments:

  1. Great job on explaining the graphs!

    ReplyDelete
  2. I agree with Bianca; your explanations as to why the graph was or was not a function was really good and easy to understand!

    ReplyDelete
  3. aroob,

    your first example is good and you explained it quite well and in good detail! the only thing missing in your explanation was to express the relationship using function notation, as is mentioned in the blog instructions for this assignment.

    in your second graph, you actually have an example of five different relationships that are functions of time. let me know if you do not understand.

    professor little

    ReplyDelete